Review Process

Organizing Committee will send each paper to 3 independent reviewers, experts in the area of the paper.
So, each paper will be evaluated by three independent experts according to the following Criteria
1) Relevance to the Conference Call
2) Scientific - Technical Originality, Potential Impact and Interest for the audience
3) Scientific/Technical Content And Advances Beyond The State-Of-The-Art
4) Quality of the Presentation, Clarity of the Content
5) Comments For The Authors
The reviewers are going to indicate their familiarity with the paper's subject, evaluate the paper along the aforementioned criteria. Finally, the Organizing Committee will decide what papers will be accepted. Our Score System will classify the papers as follows.
Excellent Papers: Papers of outstanding quality - top 10% of the accepted papers
Very good Papers: Papers of very good quality - in the top 20% of accepted papers
Good papers: Papers of average quality - in the top 33% of accepted papers
Fair Papers: Papers of fair quality and below acceptable threshold
(implies: Rejection) Poor Papers: Poor quality papers (implies: Rejection)

Categories

Publisher

The Proceedings of 2017 will be published by Springer Verlag and will be indexed in ISI, Scopus, EI-Compendex, MetaPress, SpringerLink, Scholar-Google, www.springer.com/series/7818 The Proceedings of 2016 have already been published by Springer Verlag: http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319539331 and and are indexed in ISI, Scopus, EI-Compendex, MetaPress, SpringerLink, Scholar-Google, www.springer.com/series/7818
Extended versions will appear in several well-known and well-indexed Journals after the conference.

Call for Sessions

Call for Sessions, Workshops and Minisymposia We would like to invite you to organize a Special Session, Workshop, Minisymposium for APSAC16

Read More


Academic Sponsors